Can I speed up Disk Utility First Aid by running “fsck_hfs” with the “-c” option?
1
vote
1
answer
397
views
I ran Disk Utility’s First Aid on a portable hard disk I use for Time Machine, which took around 13 hours (with no repairs being needed). I was wondering whether there’s a way to speed that up. Disk Utility’s output shows that it ran
fsck_hfs -fy -x /dev/rdisk3
, and so it doesn’t use the -c
option, which according to the command’s man page “can result in better performance”:
-c size Specify the size of the cache used by fsck_hfs internally.
Bigger size can result in better performance but can result
in deadlock when used with -l option. Size can be speci-
fied as a decimal, octal, or hexadecimal number. If the
number ends with a `k'',
m'', or
`g'', the number is
multiplied by 1024 (1K), 1048576 (1M), or 1073741824 (1G),
respectively.
I was wondering whether anyone has experience using the -c
option. Does fsck_hfs
not use a cache at all when the option is not used, or does it use a default size? How large would I need to set the cache size to see significant, or even just any, performance improvement? I assume this depends on the size of the disk; mine is 1TB with Disk Utility showing it contains around 15.500.000 files.
Asked by Rinzwind
(3751 rep)
Jun 19, 2019, 08:11 AM
Last activity: Aug 18, 2020, 07:18 AM
Last activity: Aug 18, 2020, 07:18 AM