Error "UNIQUE constraint failed" with composite primary key
0
votes
1
answer
1286
views
With littele SQL(ite) practice, I tried to create a table with a composite primary key:
~~~lang-sqlite3
CREATE TABLE NAMES (
TYPE INTEGER NOT NULL,
SEQ INTEGER NOT NULL,
NAME VARCHAR(20),
PRIMARY KEY (TYPE, SEQ)
);
~~~
The idea is to store associations from numbers to names, i.e.:
SEQ
to NAME
and back.
As there is a variable number of such "classes" I added a TYPE
column, that is that the SEQ
numbers (and NAME
s) should be *unique within a specific TYPE
*.
I also tried to create a trigger that will automatically assign the "next free" SEQ
number within a specific TYPE
like this:
~~~lang-sqlite3
CREATE TRIGGER TRG_NAMES_ADD AFTER INSERT ON NAMES
FOR EACH ROW BEGIN
UPDATE NAMES SET SEQ = (SELECT COUNT(1) FROM NAMES WHERE TYPE = NEW.TYPE)
WHERE TYPE = NEW.TYPE;
END;
~~~
When I insert the first entry, it seems to work, but when I try to add a second one, it fails with
> Runtime error: UNIQUE constraint failed: NAMES.TYPE, NAMES.SEQ (19)
like this:
~~~lang-sqlite3
sqlite> select * from NAMES;
sqlite> insert into NAMES (type, seq, name) values (0, -1, "test"); sqlite> select * from NAMES;
0|1|test
sqlite> insert into NAMES (type, seq, name) values (0, -1, "test2");
Runtime error: UNIQUE constraint failed: NAMES.TYPE, NAMES.SEQ (19)
sqlite> insert into NAMES (type, seq, name) values (1, -1, "test2");
sqlite> select * from NAMES;
0|1|test
1|1|test2
~~~
So the trigger seems to work for each TYPE
exactly once, but maybe it's not working, because the first SEQ
should have been 0 instead of 1.
I had also tried a BEFORE
rather than AFTER
trigger, but that would not change SEQ
t all (using -1).
What's wrong with the trigger, or is it the table definition?
Asked by U. Windl
(125 rep)
Aug 16, 2023, 08:06 AM
Last activity: Aug 18, 2023, 11:28 AM
Last activity: Aug 18, 2023, 11:28 AM