I have configured VSFTPD in a CentOS machine to run on two instances, with vsftpd.conf and vsftpd2.conf. Here is the content of the second conf file:
anonymous_enable=NO
chroot_list_enable=YES
chroot_list_file=/etc/vsftpd/chroot_list
chroot_local_user=YES
connect_from_port_20=YES
dirmessage_enable=YES
force_local_data_ssl=YES
force_local_logins_ssl=YES
ftpd_banner=Hello.
listen=YES
listen_port=30
local_enable=YES
local_umask=022
pam_service_name=vsftpd
pasv_enable=YES
pasv_address=192.168.100.162
pasv_max_port=389
pasv_min_port=389
rsa_cert_file=/etc/vsftpd/vsftpd.pem
ssl_enable=YES
ssl_sslv2=NO
ssl_sslv3=NO
ssl_tlsv1=YES
ssl_ciphers=HIGH
user_config_dir=/etc/vsftpd/user_conf
userlist_enable=NO
write_enable=YES
xferlog_enable=YES
xferlog_file=/var/log/xferlog2
xferlog_std_format=NO
dual_log_enable=YES
log_ftp_protocol=YES
The first conf file is identical excepting the xferlog file, the listen_port that is missing, and the pasv_max_port/pasv_min_port that are 65000/60000
So I have one FTPS working on port 21 and the other on port 30. Both are working fine, but I want to make sure that 389 is really being used. So, I started a session with Wireshark, where I could see all my TCP packets to port 30, but no one to 389. Instead, I see packets to my remote server on port 49276.
How can I make sure that this is working fine?
Asked by user73540
(21 rep)
Jun 25, 2014, 08:52 AM
Last activity: Jun 19, 2025, 11:04 AM
Last activity: Jun 19, 2025, 11:04 AM