In order to perform some JavaScript unit tests with karma inside a docker container (based on ubuntu 14.04) I'm starting firefox in the container using a karma-script-launcher with
xvfb-run
. The start script looks like this:
#!/bin/bash
set -o errexit
# nasty workaround as xvfb-run doesn't cleanup properly...
trap "pkill -f /usr/lib/firefox/firefox" EXIT
xvfb-run --auto-servernum --server-args='-screen 0, 1024x768x16' firefox $1
Starting the browser and executing the unit tests works very well. After executing the tests karma terminates the spawned browser instance - in my case the script that launched firefox over xvfb-run.
In the above script you can see that I registered a trap
to kill the launched firefox on exit of my script. This works, but the script is not a very nice citizen as it terminates **all** instances of firefox that are currently running instead of just terminating the one instance that was launched by the script. I first tried to kill the xfvb-run
process but killing this process has no effect on the sub-process launched by the xvfb-run
script...
If I start firefox over xvfb-run
manually there is a bunch of spawned processes:
root@1d7a5988e521:/data# xvfb-run --auto-servernum --server-args='-screen 0, 1024x768x16' firefox &
[1] 348
root@1d7a5988e521:/data# ps ax
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
1 ? Ss 0:00 bash
348 ? S 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/bin/xvfb-run --auto-servernum --server-args=-screen 0, 1024x768x16 firefox
360 ? S 0:00 Xvfb :99 -screen 0, 1024x768x16 -nolisten tcp -auth /tmp/xvfb-run.bgMEuq/Xauthority
361 ? Sl 0:00 /usr/lib/firefox/firefox
378 ? S 0:00 dbus-launch --autolaunch bcf665e095759bae9fc1929b57455cad --binary-syntax --close-stderr
379 ? Ss 0:00 //bin/dbus-daemon --fork --print-pid 5 --print-address 7 --session
388 ? S 0:00 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gconf/gconfd-2
414 ? R+ 0:00 ps ax
root@1d7a5988e521:/data#
If I now kill the xvfb-run
process (PID 348), only this process will be terminated, leaving the other processes running. If I kill the firefox process (PID 361) instead, the xvfb-run
script correctly terminates and kills the other processes as well. But from my script I only know the PID of the xvfb-run
process...
During my research I stumbled across this rather old bug report for xvfb-run
which still seems to be valid in spite of the bug's status beeing fixed back in 2012.
Is there any polite way to terminate the xvfb-run
process in order for the other processes to be cleaned up correctly?
---
I already asked this on Stack Overflow, but got no answer till now. Perhaps it's somewhat OT for Stack Overflow but better located here?!
Asked by dpr
(423 rep)
Jun 24, 2016, 09:23 AM
Last activity: Nov 4, 2021, 08:03 PM
Last activity: Nov 4, 2021, 08:03 PM