What an hour of Googling bring out that **mainstream** Linux kernel bugs are being logged in two distinct systems:
Mailing list
------------
> This is the Linux kernel development discussion and bug reporting
> mailing list.
The mailing list is archived by a number of services, *e.g.*
- Gmane
- lkml
- MARC
- Mail archive
- Indiana
Bugzilla
--------
> This is the Kernel Tracker system (based on Bugzilla) for posting bugs
> against the mainline Linux kernels (not distribution kernels).
Distributions, *e.g.* Ubuntu have their own bug tracker which may be set to track upstream bugs.
I wonder that,
- Are the bugs reported on the either of the services synced back to the other?
- Assuming that the mailing list and the bugzilla are not mirrors of each other (*i.e.* those are independent and bugs are *not* synced), how do Linux developers coordinate between the bugs reported across services?
- Isn't it inconvenient to refer to the bugs reported to mailing list later on due to not having any bug ID? (I understand that one can refer by a mailing archive URL, however doesn't look professional IMO)
- Should a new bug be reported to any one of the services or both?
Asked by sherlock
(686 rep)
Jun 30, 2016, 05:48 AM
Last activity: Jan 28, 2019, 10:01 AM
Last activity: Jan 28, 2019, 10:01 AM