I'm currently having some conflicted doubts about the
/usr/local
folder according to the standard.
In our application, we currently store our read-only application files in /usr/local/
. While going through the [Filesystem Hierarchy Standard](https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch04s09.html) it noted that no other directories may be in /usr/local
other than those listed.
Another [user on Stack Overflow](https://stackoverflow.com/a/34166003/9398242) quoted a text specifying that /usr/local/
is supposed to be used, but I'm unable to find this part in the FHS.
Other examples I've seen on my machine are /usr/local/mysql
and /usr/local/percona
.
Are these simply not in line with the standard? Should we be switching to /usr/local/share/
?
Asked by Indra
(3 rep)
Jun 30, 2023, 10:08 AM
Last activity: Jun 30, 2023, 10:34 AM
Last activity: Jun 30, 2023, 10:34 AM