Route through ppp0?

read carefully pls.. im connecting to another local network IN (overWAN) using q vpn (openfortivpn) to access that local network. i can ping the local hosts on that network.. i can scan em with nmap and everything work perfectly. but the problem is when i use metasploit it seems like it doesnt reconize em (local hosts on that network) even tho i changed metasploit network interface.. so whats the problem in here..any ideas!!! └─$ sudo openfortivpn [sudo] password for redandwhite: INFO: Connected to gateway. INFO: Authenticated. INFO: Remote gateway has allocated a VPN. Using interface ppp0 Connect: ppp0 /dev/pts/2 INFO: Got addresses: [192.168.10.20], ns [0.0.0.0, 0.0.0.0] INFO: Negotiation complete. INFO: Got addresses: [192.168.10.20], ns [0.0.0.0, 0.0.0.0] INFO: Negotiation complete. INFO: Got addresses: [192.168.10.20], ns [0.0.0.0, 0.0.0.0] INFO: Negotiation complete. INFO: Negotiation complete. local IP address 192.168.10.20 remote IP address 169.254.2.1 INFO: Interface ppp0 is UP. INFO: Setting new routes... INFO: Adding VPN nameservers... INFO: Tunnel is up and running. thats my openfortivpn connection.. and it create a new ppp0 interface └─$ ifconfig lo: flags=73 mtu 65536 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10 loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback) RX packets 649733 bytes 90673438 (86.4 MiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 649733 bytes 90673438 (86.4 MiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 ppp0: flags=4305 mtu 1354 inet 192.168.10.20 netmask 255.255.255.255 destination 169.254.2.1 ppp txqueuelen 3 (Point-to-Point Protocol) RX packets 111 bytes 1101 (1.0 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 132 bytes 4021 (3.9 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 wlan0: flags=4163 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet6 fe80::a5b:d6ff:fea3:cd48 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20 ether 08:5b:e2:b8:ac:84 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 1991278 bytes 1637588280 (1.5 GiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 1471015 bytes 669954984 (638.9 MiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 route -n output.. with the xx.xx.xx.xx IP that im connecting to └─$ route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 600 0 0 wlan0 xx.xx.xx.xx 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 wlan0 151.8.75.25 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0 169.254.2.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 600 0 0 wlan0 192.168.9.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0 im able to ping google using my wlan0 interface but couldnt using ppp0 interface └─$ ping -I ppp0 google.com PING google.com (142.250.201.46) from 192.168.10.20 ppp0: 56(84) bytes of data. --- google.com ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 4091ms └─$ curl --interface wlan0 ifconfig.co xx.xx.xx.xx ┌──(redandwhite㉿kali)-[~] └─$ curl --interface ppp0 ifconfig.co i think the idea is add two default gateways. the main idea behind the second gateway approach, is to create a second routing table..so that the routes are added and deleted whenever the vpn connection is established.. but hv no idea to do so + i dont wanna mess things up.