Why is the sticky bit mentioned twice in chmod but only once in the ls output?
0
votes
1
answer
69
views
My task was to configure a directory so that users in a group could only delete files they own.
I used
1771 RandD
, as suggested by lab instructions, to accomplish this.
When running -l
, the permissions were displayed as --t
.
I understand why there is a
at the end of the permissions, since the last 1 in 1771 RandD
is responsible for other permissions. However, what is the point of the first 1 if
is not displayed in the user's permissions section?
Asked by user597693
Jan 24, 2024, 07:30 PM
Last activity: Jan 24, 2024, 07:55 PM
Last activity: Jan 24, 2024, 07:55 PM