systemd "socket activation" vs xinetd
8
votes
2
answers
5016
views
I use
xinetd
and it works for my purposes. However I recently discovered that systemd has something built in called "socket activation".
These two seem very similar, but systemd is "official" and seems like the better choice.
*However before using it, are they really the same? Are there differences I should be aware of?*
For example, I want to start some dockerised services only when they are first requested - my first thought would be to use xinetd. But is socket activation better / faster / stabler / whatever?
Asked by lonix
(1965 rep)
Sep 23, 2018, 01:39 PM
Last activity: Sep 23, 2018, 02:05 PM
Last activity: Sep 23, 2018, 02:05 PM